<aside> đź’ˇ See also How Arguments Work - A Guide to Writing and Analyzing Texts in College (Mills) - Humanities LibreTexts
</aside>
In order for your argument to be persuasive, it must use an organizational structure that the audience perceives as both logical and easy to parse. Three argumentative methods—the Toulmin Method, Rogerian Method, and Classical Method—give guidance for how to organize the points in an argument.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/5ecWOTKKmM1UHNHLsryCyI?si=xBcmDGFpQIqx3Mvm42aYQA
Note that these are only three of the most popular models for organizing an argument. Alternatives exist. Be sure to contact me immediately if you are considering anything other than the Toulmin Method (as described below). About me
In order for your argument to be sound, consider an organizational structure that the target audience perceives as both logical and easy to follow or understand (to parse). Three argumentative methods (i.e., the Classical Method, the Toulmin Method, and the Rogerian Method) provide ways of organizing ideas when forming an argument.
[!note] The three methods listed below are the most popular models for organizing an argument. Alternatives exist, so always be sure to ask your instructor if you are considering anything other than the three methods described below. For those taking Thesis Seminar, consider combining the classical method overall and the Toulmin Method when developing a body paragraph.
The Classical Method of structuring an argument is another common way to organize your points. Originally devised by the Greek philosopher Aristotle (and then later developed by Roman thinkers like Cicero and Quintilian), classical arguments tend to focus on issues of definition and the careful application of evidence. Thus, the underlying assumption of classical argumentation is that, when all parties understand the issue perfectly, the correct course of action will be clear.
The classical argument is made up of five components, which are most commonly composed in the following order: